How EASA Differs from FAA in Aircraft Maintenance Licensing: A Regulatory Comparison

When it comes to aircraft maintenance licensing, EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) and the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) follow two distinctly structured systems. While both prioritize safety and compliance, their approach to licensing, certification, and training requirements differ significantly.

This article provides a real-world, regulation-based comparison to help aviation professionals, trainees, and employers understand how these two authorities structure maintenance licensing.


🛠️ 1. License Name and Category Structure

AspectEASAFAA
License NameEASA Part-66 AML (Aircraft Maintenance License)FAA A&P Certificate (Airframe & Powerplant)
Category SystemMultiple categories: A, B1, B2, B3, CSingle combined license: A&P
ScopeSeparate licenses for airframe, powerplant, avionicsCombined airframe & powerplant privileges
AvionicsRequires a B2 licenseNo separate avionics license; handled under A&P or Repairman Certificate

Regulation Source:


📚 2. Training and Education Requirements

AspectEASAFAA
Approved SchoolMust attend a Part-147 approved schoolCan attend FAA Part-147 school or gain experience directly
Theoretical HoursMandatory minimum based on category (e.g., 2400+ hrs for B1.1)No minimum hour requirement if based on work experience
Practical ExperienceStructured and recorded by Part-147 school or work18 months for A or P, 30 months for A&P combined

Regulation Source:


📝 3. Examination and Assessment

AspectEASAFAA
Theoretical ExamModular exams (13-17 modules depending on category)Single written exams for Airframe and Powerplant
Oral & PracticalConducted at school or Competent AuthorityConducted by a Designated Mechanic Examiner (DME)
Pass Criteria75% minimum per module~70% on each part

✅ EASA exams are modular and detailed—each topic like “Electrical Fundamentals” or “Digital Techniques” has its own paper. FAA combines theory into broader sections.


🔁 4. License Renewal & Validity

AspectEASAFAA
License ValidityLifetime, but must remain valid through recency & experienceLifetime unless revoked or surrendered
Recency Requirement6 months of relevant work in 2 years (Part-66.A.20(b))No work recency required to keep certificate, but may affect employment
Type RatingRequired for large aircraft (e.g., A320, B737)Not part of license, but required by employer or MRO under company training

🌐 5. Mobility and Recognition

AspectEASAFAA
Geographic UseValid across 30+ EASA member statesValid only in the United States and some US territories
ConversionFAA to EASA: Requires modular exams and trainingEASA to FAA: Requires taking full A&P exam (no direct conversion)
Language RequirementEnglish proficiency mandatoryAlso requires English, assessed during testing process

🧑‍🔧 6. Privileges of the License Holder

AspectEASAFAA
Release to ServiceB1/B2 license holders can certify work (CRS)A&P holders can return aircraft to service (except major repairs unless IA-certified)
Inspection Authorization (IA)Not applicable; authority via Category CRequires separate IA exam for major inspections/sign-offs
Independent WorkCan be limited based on Part-145/Part-M organizationMore flexibility for freelance or small shop work

✈️ Final Thoughts

Understanding the differences between EASA and FAA maintenance licenses is essential for any aviation professional seeking global mobility or planning their career path. Here’s the essence:

  • EASA follows a modular, highly structured licensing framework with mandatory training and aircraft type ratings.
  • FAA offers a flexible experience-based path but with fewer license categories.

Whether you’re an aspiring Part-66 technician in Europe or looking to earn your A&P in the U.S., aligning your training and experience with the right regulatory authority will define your professional scope.


✅ Bonus Tip:

If you’re planning to convert between EASA and FAA, begin gathering your logbooks, experience records, and official certificates early—conversion isn’t automatic and may involve exams, validations, and formal approvals.